Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulitzer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of online encyclopedias. Yes, it doesn't currently fit there, so either the target page's scope needs to be expanded, or another redirect target found, or failing that the redirect can be RfD'ed. Sandstein 09:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ulitzer[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic lacks multiple reliable independent sources. The site seems to have stopped adding content in 2012 so it was short-lived and not notable. Mccapra (talk) 00:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I started this article, in 2009, all subsequent edits were made by others. I am going to question the nominations assertion the site was "short-lived". Eric S. Raymond's author page says he started editing there in 2003. So, even in the nomination is correct that the site stopped adding new material in 2012, that would still be a decade or so. Geo Swan (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe we need a list of failed wikipedia-killers? Google's Gnol was also supposed to be a wikipedia-killer. It stopped accepting new content in 2012, which Mccapra asserts Ulitzer stopped accepting new content. Under what conditions would it make sense to keep the article on Gnol, and delete the article on Ulitzer? Geo Swan (talk) 04:17, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
List of online encyclopedias--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 01:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to List of online encyclopedias Geo Swan (talk) 02:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of online encyclopedias, don't see notability on its own. Reywas92^Talk 22:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: List of online encyclopedias's inclusion criteria is restricted to independently notable encyclopedias (with their own articles)—other options?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 03:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ulitzer may have been an encyclopaedia at one time but from its surviving zombie website it doesn’t seem to have been one at the end of its life, more a kind of blog aggregator. Mccapra (talk) 06:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.