Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugly (Screaming Females album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ugly (Screaming Females album)[edit]
- Ugly (Screaming Females album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to have been a notable album. No references provided. Salimfadhley (talk) 11:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per WP:BEFORE, I did a Google search and found 125,000 results, including many from independent and reliable sources sufficient to meet WP:GNG. I've now added some sources and a Reception section to the article. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per new references in the article. SL93 (talk) 18:41, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the article's current sources plus others that exist (e.g., The Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, and Spin magazine. Subject passes WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow Talk 05:49, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article references multiple professional reviews from WP:RS. Metacritic alone lists 14 professional reviews. Easily passes WP:GNG. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.