Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uday Dutt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uday Dutt[edit]
- Uday Dutt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The only third-party reliable source I can find covering anyone with this name is [1]. Writing an article on the basis of this would violate WP:BLP1E. According to this blog entry, the subject has "use[d] SEO to get his name out there on the internet through Google. Then he had to build some sites and profiles to ensure he has lot of backlinks. He also maintained profiles on social media sites which helped him to flush out other irrelevant results on the SERPs", which implies the article was started to improve the subject's profile on Google. Hut 8.5 11:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 13:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Am not sure if the Uday Dutt accused of financial fraud is same as the "investor banker" described in Uday Dutt. That aside, the article subject fails WP:BIO with his linked-in page and personal website being the only available sources. Abecedare (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable astroturfing. Maralia (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn, fails WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.