Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udaaya Futsal Cup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Udaaya Futsal Cup[edit]

Udaaya Futsal Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable event. A good faith search for information turned up no results. In addition, the tournament has only be held two times, so it may be WP:TOOSOON for it to be included in an encyclopedia. SamHolt6 (talk) 06:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete seems like its an organisation trying to promote what they do. Fails WP:NFOOTY and no references. NZFC(talk) 07:18, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Its not any sort of promotional page. It's for the updates about the event and a kind of references for Future. All the text are written by myself so there are no any sources of reference. 14:16 27 March, 2018 (UTC +5:45) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sthapitrikesh (talkcontribs) 08:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, at best this is WP:TOOSOON but that is pushing it even, given the creator themself concedes there are no refereces or sources and that the whole thing has been written freehand! A case could be argued for speedy delete even. Nothing encyclopedic about this i'm afraid. Bungle (talkcontribs) 09:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable tournament, no indication of significant third party coverage fo a non-routine nature to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Completely unsourced and there-for fails GNG. Govvy (talk) 11:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.