Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Mobile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 06:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

US Mobile[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem particularly notable, most refs are from the company. Frood 22:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Entrepeneur story was primarily about finding an office phone system, not about US Mobile itself. The PC Magazine story was fine, but it's just one brief story about a small company -- not enough to indicate notability. I can't read the WSJ story because of the paywall, but judging by the title and tagline, I'd guess it's more about Connecticut's startup scene broadly rather than specifically about US Mobile. I can't find any other decent coverage on Google. There's just not enough significant coverage here for an article. -IagoQnsi (talk) 22:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads more like a promotional piece and fails to establish notability. sixtynine ^{• speak up •}
Keep Looks like the article has been changed and should be reevaluated. -Evaeva79 (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two out of the five sources cited are still on US Mobile's own page. Moaz786 (talk|contribs) 17:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for same reasons as IagoQnsi and sixtynine. Moaz786 (talk|contribs) 00:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.