Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Arena Professional Soccer League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Small consensus that whilst the competition might become notable once it has actually begun, insufficient sources currently exist to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

US Arena Professional Soccer League[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be both WP:TOOSOON and WP:PROMO from an account with a pretty clear (from user name) WP:COI issue. No references or sourcing, links on the org's page show only a few local stories about a non existent 4 team one state group that can't even afford places to practice. JamesG5 (talk) 05:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 08:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 08:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just looked at the user's contributions and they've been around since 2008 making various indoor soccer related edits. I don't think there's necessarily a COI here. Jay eyem (talk) 22:52, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 11:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I didn't technically !vote last time, but after some searching for the league I only really found this link, and I don't think that's enough to meet WP:GNG. Don't agree with the nominator's rationale, but agree that deletion is the right choice. Jay eyem (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Jay eyem Spiderone 18:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.