Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNregular Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UNregular Radio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable internet radio station. Looks like advertising. The Banner talk 09:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't appear to pass WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 05:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Who are you to decide what is notable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.203.233.55 (talk) 04:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will work on making this article sound like less of an ad.Rawisrob (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Dearth of refs (no non-SPS) for a contemporary online radio station, fails GNG. czar · · 05:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not meet WP:GNG nor does it enjoy the notability of broadcast radio/TV stations under WP:NMEDIA. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 13:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.