Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKonian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Rje 14:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UKonian[edit]

This article is WP:OR and is also a Protologism Mal 04:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can find sparse usage of the term on the internet, but at best this is a transwiki to Wiktionary, I think. Aplomado ^talk 04:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to English people or something similar. - Richardcavell 05:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Presumably the reason for coining a term such as "UKonian" is that "English people" is totally inaccurate for this purpose. --Ryano 10:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Which makes no sense considering the perfectly legitimate "British" term exists. *shrugs* --Mal 06:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unreferenced, unsourced proto/neologism. If references and a citation of usage in popular media can be provided then it can be transwikied to Wiktionary. (aeropagitica) (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete protologism and WP:NOT for those and not a dictionary either. UKanian is much more common, but even that would only be a dicdef. Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOT a dictionary. I'm British and I've never heard the term before Ydam 12:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete protologism. Vizjim 12:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. TheMadBaron 16:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.