Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UGC 11066

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker ^talk 00:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UGC 11066[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only notable for the supernova that occurred in it in 2005. Per WP:NASTRO, such passing mention in the papers that mention the supernova does not constitute significant coverage, and thus this article fails both WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. StringTheory11 (t • c) 15:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —innotata 17:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.