Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC Champions Drug Abuse List

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:BLP and WP:SNOW. Nick Dowling (talk) 02:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UFC Champions Drug Abuse List[edit]

Unsourced list claiming drug abuse of living people. I know most of these could be sourced, I believe this topic could be better handled on each person listed here's own article. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 00:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a list like this needs meticulous sourcing, per WP:BLP. This article does not have that. Aside from that, I agree with the nominator that this information, even when sourced, would probably be better served on each individual athlete's biography page. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, I found it interesting, but the list is just asking for a lawsuit. If the list had citations for each entry I would say keep, because banned substances in mixed martial arts is a hot topic — but the list contains no citations and these are living people so I think WP:BLP applies. Of the 9 people that appear on the list, I did see mention of the drugs on the articles Josh Barnett (no citation), Tim Sylvia [1], Vitor Belfort (URLs down), Sean Sherk [2], and Ricco Rodriguez [3]. Those citations could be added to the list, but the title of the article is not quite neutral and limiting it to UFC champions is kind of arbitrary. The list does not specify if the fighter was taking the drug when they won the title so it's misleading. Looking at the article history, it looks like the article is a magnet for speculation. If the page is meant to disparage these people, it could even be speedily deleted per WP:CSD#G10. --Pixelface (talk) 01:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yes there's smoke [4] but the claims of fire here need reliable sources to back them up due to WP:BLP concerns. JJL (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge sourced info into criticism section in Ultimate Fighting Championship. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 01:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per BLP (technically the article should be blanked since BLP violations should be deleted right away). TJ Spyke 02:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.