Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 66

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, despite efforts of anons. Punkmorten 22:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

UFC 66

This event, while likely to occur in the future, does not pass Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Only generic information is available for this event, and the promoters themselves, so far, have only applied for a license for this show with the Nevada State Athletic Commission[1] and that is no guarantee that the event will happen. In general, articles for UFC events are created only when the UFC themselves announce them. Prod was removed by an anonymous editor without explanation. hateless 01:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. UFC 63 is the next event, so this is a little more than a little too early. JPG-GR 03:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Its still a bit early to write on UFC 66, especially since UFC 65 and UFC 64 haven't started yet.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• keep it. It may be early, but may as well keep it here, there are already some good points (one of which is mine) as to why to keep it in the discussion section of the article. 20:22, 18 September 2006 (GMT) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.122.121.226 (talk • contribs) .
  • "Any WP moderator considering this for deletion is crazy" does not constitute a good point. Strong Delete for crystalballism. Danny Lilithborne 22:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I fail to see why these events, which are apparently held every month or so, are notable in the first place. Be that as it may, as noted above, two others in the series have yet to take place that are scheduled prior to this one. Oldcritter 20:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Wikipedia policies. However, feel free to create an account and familiarize yourself with our policies. That way, your edits don't end up back here in AfD --Roninbk 20:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• added comment. I've already got a comment down, but just wanted to add, why are people even bothered about this article when they are not UFC aficionado's?????, true UFC enthusiasts will appreciate this article being here. 00:39, 19 September 2006 (GMT) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.122.121.226 (talk • contribs) .
  • Comment That's nice to know. Try again when you have an actual argument. Danny Lilithborne 00:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, I follow the UFC, as do plenty other editors on WP. The problem is that information pertaining to this event is almost all speculation, and speculation is not allowed on WP, nevermind its existance already breaks WP:NOT. The article will get created, when there is verifiable information available. Also, just because that template says speculatory information may be in the article, it does not permit speculation, it only means less experienced editors may edit material in that is prohibited by WP policies. hateless 00:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Falls under WP:NOT, "individual items from a predetermined list or a systematic pattern of names, preassigned to future events or discoveries, are not suitable article topics, if only generic information is known about the item." Certainly the case here. --- Trench 20:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No content. StuffOfInterest 23:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Danny Lilithborne Why are you trying to provoke or initiate a quarrel/dispute with subtle incivility? 81.131.96.188 01:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.