Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UCLA/VA Multicampus PM&R Residency Program

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UCLA/VA Multicampus PM&R Residency Program[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page for a non-notable medical residency program. The list of "Pain fellows", as well as edit comments like "Added Dr. Riggs to the list" speaks to the fact that this page uses Wikipedia as web host for the program's participants rather than as a global encyclopedia. WP:BEFORE searches turn up little. This belongs on the UCLA web site, rather than here. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 17:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree with the assessment of HappyValleyEditor. In a world where every Kardashian gets their own Wikipedia entry, contributions made by those in medicine, arts, sciences, math and engineering languish in the dark. Wikipedia serves as an encyclopedia that acknowledges the importance of those in the fields not on TMZ every day. Sites like UCLA/VA Multicampus PM&R Residency Program are available through the world wide web around the world and are helpful for those who may be interested in doing a site visit or are interested in learning more about an important medical fields like physiatry. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Katomin (talk • contribs) — Katomin (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

delete well i would flip that around HappyValley. I think the residency program is a good one but I don't know that any residency program could pass NOTABILITY. In any case this is not an encyclopedia article but a webhost page for the program, and we are not a webhost. So fails NOTABILITY and even if it didn't, it needs WP:TNT. Jytdog (talk) 23:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this still seems questionable for its own notable article, unlikely anything else but best connected to the university itself. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.