Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U2's 16th Album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Peacent 01:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U2's 16th Album[edit]

Borderline speedy candidate for failing WP:CSD#A1, but regardless, almost certainly fails WP:CRYSTAL #2. I have no doubt that this article is going to be released but the fact the only detail that has been released about it is the fact that recording has started - this is generic information, and a limit amount at that. Proposing delete. AllynJ 21:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - plenty of sources quoted, including notable ones, eg VH1 and RTE. --Oscarthecat 22:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Narrow Keep - I know there is some several key items missing (especially the track list, album title and exact release date) there but it is just enough mainly due to the references.--JForget 22:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - to above; indeed, when I added the AfD template there was nothing more than an infobox. I'm less concerned about this article now, but I still consider it a borderline WP:CRYSTAL candidate. AllynJ 22:43, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but replace the phrase "it is unknown at what point the sessions are" with some nicer grammar. Capmango 05:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- well...you could do that. Don't wait for the closing admin...-MrFizyx 16:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Happy to do it, but wasn't going to bother if article got delete. I'll fix it if article is kept. Capmango 17:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't think it is crystal ballery, in fact, U2 isn't likely to lie about their future releases, and mentions by the mass media makes the album more certain.--Kylohk 15:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep- sourced (though not all likely to pass WP:RS. More info is likely to emerge. U2 are kinda notable and all. -MrFizyx 16:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.