Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U-Jam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
U-Jam[edit]
- U-Jam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not-notable. Fancruft. A "moniker" used for one show. No inline citations or references means zero reliability. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete not notable enough for a stand alone article. A properly referenced mention in U2 and Pearl Jam should be enough. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, but don't mention in articles. TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 14:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a nickname does not deserve an article. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment although I agree that this nickname doesn't deserve an article I'm not sure that's a valid reason for deletion on its own (don't make me say The_Edge) and invoke WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ... kidding mostly btw. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.