Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U-Fig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 1ne 01:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U-Fig[edit]

Contested ProD by an Anon user, with no explanation as to why. I am nominating this page for deletion for three reasons. First, it fails to establish notability. It's not a single, it hasn't gained any notability, and it's just a song on one of their CD's. What makes this song stand out that it deserves an article? Second, all the article is is a play-by-play description of how the song goes, down to what each instrument sounds like. I guess this would fall under WP:NOT#IINFO, specifically Plot Summaries and Lyrics Database. Lastly, the interpretation of the lyrics is all Original Research. None of the interpretations are sourced, nor could they possibly be sourced, and they make no sense at all. SuperDT 17:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If you're using NOR and NN as reason, why not nominate the articles on all the other songs in the album? Mystache 17:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Thank you, I am :) SuperDT 17:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for my reasons above:

Merge There is some information in the song articles not covered by the album article, if that information can get referenced it should be merged. Monty845 18:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not a particularly notable song, wikipedia is not a list for every single song.--Bryson^{Talk}^{Edits} 21:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'Merge all to Hypnotize (album). --Selket ^Talk 23:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to the album. Singles might deserve their own pages but each song on an album is going too far. Stifle (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any useful/important info that's not on the album page, the Redirect all. SteveLamacq43 22:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All Unreferenced primary content. Reads more like a musical critique. I see no reason why these need to be on Wikipedia. Don't people know about MySpace... ? - BierHerr 16:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
no comment on Holy Mountains, and delete all the other articles. Unreferenced primary content. System of a Down is notable, are they notable enough to have an article written on an individual song? Even if so, these articles are so OR that perhaps it's better to delete them. If someone wrote a proper article about the songs that met Wikipedia standards for inclusion, I'd be all for keeping. As for Holy Mountains, it seems to be something more than simple OR and a meaningful song for the group, so I'd be willing to vote keep for that if it can be backed up with one simple reference. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 22:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.