Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyson, Arizona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tyson, Arizona[edit]

Tyson, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another passing siding where I find little evidence of anything much. As with Colfred you can see the slight swerve of the paralleling road, but other than a swath of irrigated farmland on the south side of the road, there's nothing here, and topo maps before the 1950s show nothing but the rails. Mangoe (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete concur with nom, just another railroad passing siding. Not to be confused with Fort Tyson 50 miles to the north. MB 18:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Mass-produced non-populated place. Reywas92Talk 19:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails WP:GNG, a notability prerequisite for inclusion of any place, as a non-populated place. The only thing of some notability is that Union Pacific uses a siding, that was inherited from Southern Pacific Railroad (one stretch runs from Yuma to Pheonix), for storing hundreds of railcars especially in the area that includes Tyson, Growler, and Kofa. These railcars do not add to the population (probably near zero) and there does not seem to be any sources to show historical significance. Otr500 (talk) 13:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.