Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrian Camilo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nothing to assert notability. BLACKKITE 00:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrian Camilo[edit]

While the article makes it appear as though the subject is a notable entrepreneur, this is about a virtual "business" in the game Second Life. Google results (under 800) return primarily blogs from people who play Second Life. May also be a vanity page, as author's name is the same as the article subject. Gromlakh (talk) 23:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Notable entrepreneur in the virtual world of Second Life and a key figure in the virtual economy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyriancamilo (talk • contribs) 23:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Google search Tyrian Camilo, results 1190

http://www.google.fi/search?q=tyrian+camilo&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyriancamilo (talk • contribs) 23:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC) — Tyriancamilo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete Subject has not been covered in any reliable third party sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless some sources independent of Second Life can verify that he is notable. I suggest you read this site's notability guidelines first before claiming you meet them, Mr. Camilo. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 01:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TenPoundHammer. Even for video game players, notability is defined by real world coverage. No coverage, not notable. Reso lute 01:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per reasons above. Earth bending master 02:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the reasons stated above. --L. Pistachio (talk) 11:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.