Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twiztid Presents: Year Of The Sword

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twiztid Presents: Year Of The Sword[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. Pre-emptive article so little coverage has been given, suggesting that its only purpose is to advertise the album. DrStrauss talk 22:24, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft move to draftspace until it receives reviews in reliable sources which will be nearer or after it's release. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most artists seem notable, and I assume likely to get RS reviews and covereage. Keep or move to draftspace as above? Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Entirely speculative and without sources required for GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails the WP:GNG. Not worth sending to draftspace when its little more than a tracklist sourced to Itunes and a non-RS fansite. Sergecross73 msg me 14:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree that it doesn't meet the inclusion criteria, and that it is very unlikely to do so, so moving to draft does not make sense. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.