Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twist (Harkaitz Cano)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments (non-admin closure) czar · · 21:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Twist (Harkaitz Cano)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should not exist, instead, create the novel's page Mat ty.007 13:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn-I originally thought Twist was a character in a book called 'Harkaitz Cano', but I now know that this is not the case. Mat ty.007 19:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that Twist was a character in the book of Harkaitz Cano, apologies if I was wrong. Mat ty.007 20:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the name should be Twist (novel), as this gives a greater indication of the context of the name. An example is here. Mat ty.007 16:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep and Cleanup I don't get what you mean by your reasons. The article is extremely disorganized and needs cleanup, but it meets WP:NBOOKS as it has been covered by at least 3 sources (albeit reviews) and has its own article on the Basque Wikipedia (found here). Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 15:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 17:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Matty, are you recommending deletion in any way? Your argument appears to recommended "move/rename" as the course of action, so I wanted to give you a heads up that AfD noms that don't have a deletion argument qualify for speedy keep #1. If this is the case, you may want to withdraw your nom. In the future, you can propose what may be a controversial move/rename via Wikipedia:Requested moves, the article talk page, or otherwise just do it yourself WP:BOLDly. Have a good one czar · · 17:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.