Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinfools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Twinfools[edit]
- Twinfools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not even a neologism, looks like something made up one day as "twinfool definition" didn't bring up anything on Google [1]. Cassandra 73 (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 00:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Armbrust Talk Contribs 15:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like obvious WP:MADEUP nonsense - Google only finds usernames on Twitter, Flickr etc. -- Boing! said Zebedee 09:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.