Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Lakes, Kern County, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Lakes, Kern County, California[edit]

Twin Lakes, Kern County, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What GMaps shows a vague group of houses which might be called a locale, at best. The topos are quite illuminating, because the oldest one (from the 1940s) show a White Oak Lodge, and take a pair of ponds as Twin Lakes. The label changes to Whiteoak Lodge, and then it goes away and the area itself gets labelled Twin Lakes. A settlement? No. Mangoe (talk) 16:39, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:06, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No post office. Searching Newspapers.com and GBooks was difficult because of the many Twin Lakes around, especially near Santa Cruz and Bridgeport. As reported above, there is a GNIS record for White Oak Lodge (Historical) that seems to be quite close to Twin Lakes. Searching for newspapers.com for ' "White Oak Lodge" "Twin Lakes" ' found some real estate articles and one article about earthquake aftershocks. Twin Lakes has no legal recognition, very little coverage, #1 or #2 of WP:GEOLAND are not met. Cxbrx (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.