Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twilight Watch (Sumerechniy Dozor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight Watch (Sumerechniy Dozor)[edit]

Fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that filming has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced article that appears to be about a future film; apparently still in pre-production http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0418205/]. JJL (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks anything beyond the promise of an existence eventually. Agree with Girolamo that recreation in light of actual production (or articles about failure to launch due to lousy box office of first two), would be reasonable. ThuranX (talk) 07:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Dusk Watch, the novel on which this film is based. PC78 (talk) 11:38, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Both Twilight Watch and Sumerechniy Dozor (I created the latter one just now) redirect to Dusk Watch. This title fails naming conventions and without any actual proof the film is being made, mention in the book article is too early. Lack of actual content makes it too early to have a separate article. - Mgm|^(talk) 14:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.