Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twilight, New Moon, Eclipse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singu larity 02:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight, New Moon, Eclipse[edit]

All of these books already have their own articles. I can't even see what purpose this article is meant to serve. faithless (^speak) 01:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete - I agree with faithless. there are already articles about these books, and even one about the whole series. i don't see any reason anyone would search for that term either.Sudoku424 (talk) 01:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom and above. Duplicate information. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)Delete as redundant to the article Twilight (series), as well as the articles for the individual books. I'd recommend redirect if this were at all a likely search string. Deor (talk) 01:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Twilight (series). Obviously redundant with other articles. No harm in creating the redirect. Aleta (talk) 05:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Twilight (series). Obviously redundant with other articles.Osli73 (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.