Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tv Russia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tv Russia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article's author has a history of copypasting articles about other TV channels/networks, and 'tweaking' them slightly to be an article about a channel or network for which little to no third-party reliable sources exist.

In this case, this article was a copypaste of S4C. In fact, the channels in the Infobox are S4C's channels. There are no third-party sources supporting this channel. Singularity42 (talk) 15:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also adding the following articles for similar reasons (in this case, the article is a copypaste from Al Jazeera Urdu, and there is no evidence that the other network actualy exists):

Tv World in Urdu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Singularity42 (talk) 12:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I had originally PROD'd both articles, but the author removed them with no explanation. The author was notified about this discussion but has chosen not to participate. Had the PROD not been removed, both articles would have been deleted by now. Do we really need to re-list this one? Singularity42 (talk) 03:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend tagging it for speedy deletion per G3:blatant hoaxes. - Yk³ talk · contrib 03:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pretty obvious case here, lack of sources/copying etc. Qrsdogg (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.