Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turki AlMohsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Turki AlMohsen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Turki AlMohsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable, all the sources are churnalism/gossipy cruft and a search under his arabic name gives only 8 hits, none of which are particularly useful to establish notability. This was also previously deleted as Telfaz11 and it appears that someone has engaged in PR shopping to get his name out there. Praxidicae (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable! I don't found any reliable sources about him on Arabic Language, also as Ref. NO.6 (in Arabic) not mean anything, all results about him related to his accounts on the social media. His article on arwiki translated from this enwiki version before few days (8 Jan. 2020) in competition about Saudi Arabia in arwiki. Now I deleted arwiki article as under non-notability reason --Alaa :)..! 19:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Another nonsense article for a non notable individual who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources.Celestina007 (talk) 20:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Verna Magazine and Resident Weekly are two of at least 60 fake news sites that are all operated from the same address as apstersmedia.com, coveragelog.com, curiousdesk.com, fabworldtoday.com, globestats.com, newsdistinct.com, newsheadline.us, residentweekly.com and openthenews.com. Fake sources all, operated by a black hat publicity firm. Compare http://www.residentweekly.com/contact-us/ and http://www.vernamagazine.com/contact-us/ Vexations (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Vexations That is awesome! Do you have a list anywhere on Wiki so I can run a coiBot report? Praxidicae (talk) 20:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Praxidicae, I'll post a list at User:Vexations/Fake sources. I'm working through all the articles that use any of these sources. I'm looking at [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] It's going to busy at AfD. Or maybe we should just G11 the whole bunch and save us all a lot of time. Vexations (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

  Vexations I think perhaps once we get the reports done (see here for what I've started) we should make a thread...somewhere and perhaps get a CU involved because I suspect this is going to have a plethora of various UPE editing groups and then yeah, I'd say g11/g5 the lot where no other sources exist and the rest we AFD. Praxidicae (talk) 20:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Non- notable person and probably created by a WP:UPE. They're only two outstanding sources which have been spotted by an editor as fake. Fails WP:RS. Lapablo (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete with thanks to Praxidicae for starting the AfD – I was going to, but had to leave my computer for a bit. As curious as I am about the place that is known for circumstances, it is very clear that none of the sources is any good. Also clear COI/UPE editing (none of the sources mentions a birthdate, yet the article creator somehow knew it...) --bonadea contributions talk 23:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete; the non-fake news articles (these four "news" articles) seem to all be paid promotions. They also reference his youtube channel's statistics to a major extent, which is not very indicative of a source that heralds some contributions towards GNG given that his youtubing career isn't his main profession. J947 ^(c), at 01:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - editors, producers, and writers for comedy shows are run of the mill, unless they win a major award or garner significant coverage, but reliable sources are lacking here. Bearian (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.