Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunisha Sharma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator was blocked by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisha Sharma[edit]

Tunisha Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dear The Template AFD i added is Explained, (AS RV) Which means reverted vandalism. The Person is not notable. Wikipedia Admins does not consider small/blog websites like Patrila News, India Today, Fuzion Show, TellyChakkar, Bollyhunt as References. These are are used there for reference. Hence it's wrong use of Wikipedia for Publicity. Thanks and I am Again Undoing the changes with valid description. PranshiKapoor (talk) 10:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Unintelligible nomination, which does not explain "the policies and guidelines which are of concern". Nominator removed references, including the Times of India, which is a reliable source from the article at the same time as adding the AFD template. I have reinstated these references. - Arjayay (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - nominator blocked as a sockpuppet. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.