Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tumpa Paul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tumpa Paul[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Some minor coverage. scope_creep^Talk 22:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, in addition to the underlying concerns about the subject's notability, there's several signs of undisclosed paid editing and attempts to game the system by repeatedly resubmitting the declined article at AfC and then attempting to sidestep AfC review and move the article to mainspace unilaterally. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 22:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 22:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources presented that shows she has significant coverage, only passing mentions. This used to point to one of the shows but she's in two shows now. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trivial mentions, no substantial coverage of the subject from reliable sources. — Infogapp1 (talk) 11:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minor actress whom fails almost every notability guideline, occasional mentions in sources. Yikes. The method of creation also looks suspiciously close to that of promotional content. Eternal Shadow Talk 15:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.