Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucker Knight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tucker Knight[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable wrestler. He is just a develoment talent in WWE's farm territory. Just had a few matches. Too soon for this article. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - wrestler is an active member of WWE's televised roster, article has significant independent coverage. Dannys-777 (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The "significant independent coverage" looks like wp:routine. Most of the sources are just a few televised matches. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are 3 different WP:RS which have independent articles based on him. I believe this is enough to establish WP:GNG. - Galatz ^Talk 17:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Mostly WP:ROUTINE coverage. The articles based on him are all from the same local media group from his hometown. Nikki♥311 04:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Dannys-777. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 23:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Where is it written that being an active member of WWE's roster makes you automatically notable (WP:INHERIT)? Please provide a rationale for how he has significant independent coverage. Nikki♥311 01:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2], [3] (although this source requires a subscription to view it), [4], and I did find others with a mention, and there are the other obvious reliable wrestling sites. Next time, Nikki311, go at the person who made the initial comment not me. Galatz made a comment about sources, but you never went at him. No need to come at me. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 18:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources 1 and 4 are passing mentions. Sources 2 and 3 are from the same local media group from his hometown (as I said above in response to Galatz). I responded to him and you. I just replied under your comment, because it came after what I initially wrote. Nikki♥311 23:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:ROUTINE coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.