Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubman Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, nomination withdrawn with consensus to keep. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tubman Elementary School[edit]

~~Substub, no assertion of notability. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 01:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)~~ Withdraw nomination, the cleaned up version offers a decent historical account of the school and the national recognition of its principal's accomplishments offered substantial independent coverage. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 03:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, it doesn't make any assertion of notability.Pnswmr (talk) 01:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 01:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 01:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Keep: Another one of these, "We should have given them the time of day first" instances. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 04:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: at the present time, there is no assertion of notability regarding this particular elementary school. A search on the Internet about the school failed to demonstrate that it has received any significant honors or awards other than its principal (not the school itself) in 2004. Further, there does not appear to be any notability about the school's building(s), alumni or programs. If notability can be demonstrated, I am willing to change my vote to keep. Mh29255 (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the article has been sufficiently improved to assert the notability of the school. Mh29255 (talk) 04:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - good work by DoubleBlue already has found the multiple sources to establish notability on top of the Principal being awarded and the Laura Bush reception. Last but not least there is an unusually large number of sources from which the page can be further expanded. TerriersFan (talk) 03:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Verifiable, NPOV, and completely referenced to reliable sources. DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.