Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsvetta Kaleynska (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 00:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tsvetta Kaleynska[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual, references are either primary or one-line mentions. Primefac (talk) 09:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-Now I do agree this could be better sourced, over all she does seem to be notable enough for a wiki page given what I can tell. Wgolf (talk) 19:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The cited sources are not strong. First the "rubric in the national scientific magazine" link doesn't lead to any info about her, and I assume it would just be a short entry. The "Stevie Awards" are somewhat suspect: you self nominate and pay a fee. That said, there is competition, but there is, AFAIK, no oversight on the validity of the awards. The Cosmo article is a fluff piece where she gives 5 points of advice on how to be successful on social networks (e.g. how to choose the right photo for yourself, etc.). And "EuroChicago" appears to be a blog. LaMona (talk) 01:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: For better or worse, there is a great deal of coverage of her in bulgarian media (Search under Цвета Калейнска).--Milowent • ^hasspoken 02:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.