Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsunami (political)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tsunami (political)[edit]

The topic of this article, tusnami used as a synonym for a landslide victory in a political election, is not notable per WP:NOTE. No sources discussing it as a term are given nor did I find any. The article merely gives examples of use and pure speculation on the origin of what is nothing more than a idiom. Nothing more than a dictionary definition. Drawn Some (talk) 11:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NEO, use of a term itself is not enough to confer notability on a neologism. Rather, there need to be multiple, indepth discussions of the term in reliable sources for it to be deserving of an article. There are sources that demonstrate that this term is in fact in use, but nothing more than that is provided, nor can be found. Delete article as non-notable neologism. The Seeker 4 Talk 15:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one part of dicdef. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NEO. Ohms law (talk) 02:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO or WP:NOTADICT, take your pick. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.