Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trustix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was - Keep - Noone agreeing that it should be deleted and the nomination does not give a policy reason for deleting. Lack of sources in an article is often a prompt for improvement rather than deletion.Peripitus (Talk) 11:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Trustix

Trustix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A Linux distro of unclear notability. Article lacks sources. Ham Pastrami (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

• No reason to delete Not even asserted to be non-notable. Not even asserted to be unsourceable. DGG (talk) 04:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

  The article lacks notability based on the lack of reliable sources provided and the lack of reliable sources found. The article appears to be unsourcable based on a cursory examination of hits returned by googling. This is assumed to be the case for every other good faith nomination that is brought to AfD on similar grounds. Not asserted to be notable. Not asserted to be sourceable. Ham Pastrami (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - the company and its product (the linux distro) are pretty much one and the same. Amidst all the press releases, there are these two articles from the Register. [1] and [2]. I stopped looking after these two but I suspect there could be more found. -- Whpq (talk) 14:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.