Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump–Raffensperger phone call

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) SK2242 (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trump–Raffensperger phone call[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS point 2. There’s been none or barely any coverage of this event since January 5. No evidence of enduring notability here. SK2242 (talk) 21:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 21:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 21:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 21:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This really big NYT piece is from January 15. It suggests that an investigation on the phone call is indeed happening, and will involve outside counsel. This local piece was published January 18. This will not be the last we hear about this. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out these sources. I had been unable to find them while doing a search. Closing. SK2242 (talk) 22:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.