Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Dakotan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

True Dakotan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the primary source, no sources exist establishing notability. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 23:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep bona fide newspapers are almost always considered notable and kept, this one should not be an exception. The state press association should show that more sources are available and just not in the article.--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment I placed a notification of this AFD at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Journalism. It does not seem that there is a journalism/newspaper-based deletion discussion system. It's my hope we get more discussion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is sufficient information to justify keeping. DGG ( talk ) 03:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.