Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trotline Theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Trotline Theory[edit]
- Trotline Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unambiguous original "research" violating neologism, and Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Didn't qualify under any speedy criterion, but should be an easy delete at AFD. Abecedare (talk) 06:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – original "research" pure and simple. ttonyb (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.