Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troentorp clogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Troentorp clogs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedily deleted on 28th October and now recreated company appears to fail WP:CORP. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 18:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. —Hegvald (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have no strong view on this, but here are a few Swedish sources I found when looking about: [1], [2] (articles in Helsingborgs Dagblad), [3] (link to sound file, radio report from the factory). Not much, I guess. (There may be more in paywalled newspaper archives.) --Hegvald (talk) 19:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not looked at the above refs yet, but I feel this company is notable enough for an article. Been there for over 100 years - still going - and mentioned in the Business History timeline is enough for me to say keep and hope for more refs. Will check the Swedish ones when I come back. Peridon (talk) 20:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peridon (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The 100 plus year history of this company seems significant. An internationally known product from a small village in SwedenTonysoprano11 (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.