Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triton-1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. No penalty against a future article that is adequately sourced being written in Draft space and submitted to WP:AFC Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Triton-1[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article structure does not comply with MOS, it has no source, notability is questioned, or it could be Hoax. Vitaium (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Engineering, Technology, Transportation, Azerbaijan, and Russia. Vitaium (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the submarine itself is a hoax (https://ar.culture.ru/en/subject/triton-1m, ru:Подводные лодки проекта 907 «Тритон-1М»), but it may not meet WP:GNG and the article content is dubious. PaulT2022 (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT without prejudice to being re-created in the spirit of Glazerr's proposal below. The submarine is real, but the current stub doesn't adequately describe it and isn't directly supported by the referenced source or sources mentioned here. PaulT2022 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think a better solution would be to move the article to Triton Swimmer Delivery Vehicle or Triton Diver Mobility Vehicle, and expand the scope to include Triton-1m and Triton-2. There's no question as to the existence of Triton-1, and most of this article is verifiable anyways: [1]http://www.hisutton.com/Triton-1.html [2]https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/907.htm Glazerr (talk) 00:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete Single source, thoroughly confused. There are ruwiki pages
- ru:Подводные лодки проекта 907 «Тритон-1М»
- ru:Подводные лодки проекта 908 «Тритон-2»

Possibly Triton-1 also makes sense, per sources found by Glazerr. - Altenmann >talk 00:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.