Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Kingsley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan Kingsley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claim to fame has her as an innocent bystander and not a participant so any coverage should reflect the incident not her. In any event, she otherwise fails GNG/PORNBIO. Arguably BLP1E as well. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing to suggest better notability for the applicable guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom's accurate arguments. Fleeting, happenstance event does not generate notability absent extremely unusual circumstances. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough coverage for an article. The superbowl incident isn't enough for notability - she just happened to be in video being broadcast to wrong channel and didn't have anything to do with it directly. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC
Delete Concur with nominator. Finnegas (talk) 17:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the one thing that makes her have any notice was not at all an act by her, so no claim at all to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 18:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.