Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trishla Chandola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trishla Chandola[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Participant in beauty pageants. Won the city round, but did not win at the national level. No other claim to fame. Does not meet notability. Does not meet WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Dwaipayan (talk) 15:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 16:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't think it meets guidelines in WP:PORNBIO which includes models - It does only seem like she only played a fairly minor role in the contest. Article subject had small coverage and a lot of the article, especially under "Personal Life" is unsourced. Adrianw9 (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Times of India counts as a single source per the rules since its on the same subject same paper. That leaves one other sources and I don't think two sources are enough to meet WP:GNG. Further it's basically a 1 Event situation, her career just started, WP:TOOSOON. Disagree with previous it would be under PORNBIO, she is not porn, it would be WP:NMODEL. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to I AM She 2011. Full article like Universe is her calling! Deccan Chronical would mean her name could be searchable term for some. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:NMODEL. I was tempted to recommend Redirect as above, but there are multiple possible targets such as I AM She 2011, Indian Diva 2013, and future pageants she participates in. Web/wikipedia searches would find those hits even w/o a redirect. Abecedare (talk) 07:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete exceedingly minor model. Neutrality^talk 14:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.