Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity College Lodge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity College Lodge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, lacks citation (only included link is broken), near orphan Paul W (talk) 14:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe redirect to Henry Hunt for now to save this if a better article were to ever occur as there's simply not much. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 14:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll leave it to others that are more knowledgeable, but might it be plausible to put this in WikiSource, as it seems to be that sort of a thing?--69.204.153.39 (talk) 02:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as an A7, an organization for which no claim of notability is made. Presumably this is the Free Masons' masonic lodge at Trinity College, Cambridge. No mention is made of it at the Trinity College website, which is the only listed citation, aside from the Free Mason publication. No mention of Rev. Henry Hunt is made at the Trinity College website either. I believe that this organization is different from the building, the college lodge, which is also known as "Trinity College Lodge", for which there are mentions several years prior to the formation of this Free Mason lodge. I have found no other discussions of the Free Mason lodge. --Bejnar (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's rather confusing. There's really no article here to speak of, but as a policy matter, I would say A7 deletion would be an over-reaction to what appears to be misplaced content. And ignoring the educational exemption to A7, is it even an organization we're discussing or the lodge itself (if the two can be teased apart)? The content may well be junk, but it's neither in bad faith nor threatening the integrity of the encyclopedia. It would be nice to see the matter sorted in the usual manner without resorting to speedy deletion cudgels. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 03:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is a Free Mason lodge, not an educational institution, per se. Empty is empty. It has sat here for a couple weeks already. Unfortunately, in British parlance, the college lodging hall is called a lodge. What is described in the article is the Free Mason lodge, which is an organisation. See Masonic Lodge. --Bejnar (talk) 04:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm in agreement with Bejnar. We can delete this for lack of notability etc at the appropriate time. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 03:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per A7; lacking notability. Quis separabit? 19:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.