Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity City Hotel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity City Hotel[edit]

Trinity City Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is an unsourced essay on the history of the street in which the hotel stands, not the hotel itself. There are two refs from reliable independent sources but they have nothing to do with the body of the article. Based on those two reviews alone, I don’t think this business is notable. Mccapra (talk) 12:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. In terms of WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT, there is only limited coverage of the subject available. If we exclude all of the hotel reviews from the news sources, the only coverage (of which the subject is the primary topic) that I can find are these types of profit notices. Which are fairly typical types of coverage expected for similar businesses, and do not in themselves establish notability. Per the nominator, the bulk of the content seems to be attempting to assert notability based on loose connections with unrelated subjects (like the street on which the hotel sits, or the person/people after which the street is named, or that the fire brigade or other businesses which previously occupied parts of the building). This is problematic based on WP:INHERITORG and related guidelines. In short, despite (or perhaps because of) my attempts to improve the quality of this article, I do not see how the subject is any more notable than the 800 other hotels in Dublin.... Guliolopez (talk) 12:44, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, just one of many hotels in Dublin. This one is not notable. Spleodrach (talk) 16:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per the nom and Guliolopez. I would also note that the account which created this article made no other edits on a different topic, which implies it had the singular purpose of promoting this hotel without justification over the many other similar hotels in Dublin. Newshunter12 (talk) 01:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane talk 02:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since subject lacks notability per WP:NBUILDING. The article was created by a kamikaze account, which never helps. -The Gnome (talk) 10:36, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.