Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triluminary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Outstanding elements of Babylon 5. Kurykh (talk) 02:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Triluminary[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a very minor aspect of the Babylon 5 universe. It is primarily written in an in-universe style and contains original research. For what it's worth, the Babylon 5 Wiki article is just as long, which speaks to the lack of notability even within its own universe. Thunderforge (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Outstanding elements of Babylon 5, a rather unusually named article, but seemingly the best target for a marginally notable fictional element. Jclemens (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jclemens (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jclemens (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Outstanding elements of Babylon 5 per Jclemens' comment. Aoba47 (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.