Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naroin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naroin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real evidence of notability, possibly even a hoax. Very few Google hits, no news mentions that I could find. I'm not convinced this is a real religion. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm thinking this is a hoax. The single reference has 'Ann Coulter's little princess' as the title?? Clubmarx (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem, yeah, I had to giggle at that ~~a little~~ a lot. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—I can't say whereas I have any doubt its fan fiction after reading the entire self-published page it was created in reference to: [1] and the author's home page at [2]. She does a lot of fan fiction and goes out her way to make a point of Nintendo's IP, The Legend of Zelda. I don't think she intended the piece to be a hoax, it reads like fanfic. The Ann Coulter thing might be an attempt at irony, she sometimes goes by "Princess Zelda". Her YouTube channel [3] speaks volumes about where she's coming from… in the "Gerudo" language of Hylia. However, I did add WP:HOAX to Naroin, Trigoddess, and Solissey and nominated the later two for deletion because they've found their way into: Left-Hand Path and Right-Hand Path, List of Neopagan movements, Conceptions of God, Religious symbolism, Triple deity, Category:Triune gods, Category:Neopagan festivals, Category:Neopagan holidays, Template:Neopaganism, Template:Neopaganism2 and Category:Wikipedians by religion via Category:Naroinic Wikipedians.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 22:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this an all Fan Fic that isn't published by a non-vanity press (e.g. Splinter of the Mind's Eye) Jclemens (talk) 18:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not appear to go beyond being self-published fanfic. No evidence of being talked up or reviewed by significant second parties. Herostratus (talk) 04:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed but everyone, please also consider the nature of the article prior to my edit. Thanks.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is considered, but there still is no real evidence of notability here. The only sources are another wiki and a fanfic page. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I want it to be perfectly clear I did not change an article about a religion into an article about a work of fan fiction in order to get it deleted.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are primary, that "Television Tropes & Idioms" doesn't even have "Narion" in it's text. I don't see any hope for WP:N on this. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 16:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Below, I have merged the info from the Trigoddess and Sollisey pages. I have turned those AfDs into redirects to this debate. —Ost (talk) 22:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Votes from Trigoddess AfD

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all 3 - non-notable fan fiction. The only references are the site publishing the work and a wiki page with blurb referring to Nintendo. A Google search didn't produce any reliable sources. —Ost (talk) 13:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable elements of video-game fanfic. Glenfarclas (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, and TVTropes has no notability policy and is not a valid source. --Absenteeist Ⓣ Ⓒ 20:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I added the TVTropes reference to Naroin because the article is sure to be deleted and editors might permissibly consider, in that light, the claims made about Nintendo, prior to my edit, in regard to religious content. The article's talk page would normally have been better but the hoax is consuming enough time and bandwidth already.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 05:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tridelete all, per WP:Verification. Marasmusine (talk) 09:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not sure if it's just related to the above work, but the The Legend of Zelda has no mention of this, so it most definitely fails WP:N. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 16:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Votes from Solissey AfD

Delete all - The main underlying article is not notable and has no reliable sources. Clubmarx (talk) 00:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad DumbBOT. I didn't use that template but I did put a notice on the editor's page. If someone could merge this and WP:Articles for deletion/Trigoddess into a group nomination for WP:Articles for deletion/Naroin, that would be good.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 04:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, highly non-notable holiday in a video game. ~~As to the above comment ("Delete all"), I'm pretty sure this isn't a group nomination. We're not about to delete Religious symbolism.~~ Glenfarclas (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC) Added: Oh never mind, you meant Trigoddess and Naroin. Yes, delete those too; no evidence of encyclopedic notability.[reply]
Strong delete. Non-notable trivia from non-notable work. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 16:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.