Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triggity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G3 by Enigmaman. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triggity[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism Raziman T V (talk) 19:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as neologic dicdef. But would have been better/simpler to wait a day or so for the creator to lose interest and then prod it ... –Henning Makholm (talk) 19:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NEO. Angryapathy (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as neologism. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.