Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trichy Teppakulam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per criteria 1 (nominator withdrawals nomination) (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trichy Teppakulam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proper information is not given at all. Trichy Teppakulam, the article is. But nothing refer about it and describes about surrounding areas. It must be cleared or expanded with the description about the topic alone and not any other. wiki tamil 100 (talk) 11:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 01:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 01:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator should clarify whether the article should be cleaned up or deleted. As such, it is not a hoax and articles on places definitely fulfill Wikipedia notability guidelines.-Ravi _{My Tea Kadai} 04:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it-Let it be. Don't want to be deleted. But must be cleaned up. The information must be about the temple tank only.--wiki tamil 100 (talk) 07:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, nominator does not want article deleted and as WP:NOTCLEANUP... Coolabahapple (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.