Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trianz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trianz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company; apart from two routine news coverage of acquisition transactions, there is no coverage in independent third-party reliable sources; the remaining sources are all from the company itself. TJRC (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. TJRC (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. TJRC (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRITE - no "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" - references are mainly about acquisitions, not about the company itself - no "significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education" - therefore, Delete - Epinoia (talk) 02:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet general notability criteria, just as the CEO Sri Manchala, who's article is being considered for deletion... Spyder212 (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.