Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Coop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, uncontested. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Coop[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film camera operators are almost never notable. He's not the exception to the rule. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It mentions something about being a founding member of a guild. If this can be substantiated and expanded on, that might actually make him somewhat notable. But otherwise, I'd agree: On its own, a long career as a film camera operator doesn't make you notable. We could analogise this to other professions: Being an accountant for several decades doesn't make you notable, but founding a significant accountancy organisation probably does.--Newbiepedian (Hailing Frequencies) 03:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as mentioned, unlikely notable and a better article. SwisterTwister talk 07:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no real assertion of notability beyond WP:NOTINHERITED, BLP with no reliable independent sources. Article is 8 years overdue for sourcing or deletion. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 11:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.