Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Averre-Beeson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Averre-Beeson[edit]

Trevor Averre-Beeson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines in my opinion. Would like comments/discussion regarding this subject. Has references to articles, but I still do not feel that this subject is encyclopaedic enough to have an article. Sheroddy (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 13:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 13:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 13:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Likely delete for now as although my searches found results such as this, this and this, there's nothing to suggest obvious better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 11:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. May have been the youngest secondary head at the time; certainly not the youngest ever. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.