Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevaun Solomon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trevaun Solomon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. Likely COI form the creator, but the main problem is the paucity of sources, which makes the BLP element hard to police given allegations of tax evasion. Guy (Help!) 14:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. I removed several bogus references to Trevaun Solomon articles in the NYT, Forbes and other RS. This is close to a WP:G3 case. Clearly an article written by the subject himself (who is a programmer), looking to build his profile via WP. Any references that do mention him imply zero notability. We will be seeing a 2nd AfD o this. Britishfinance (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per Britishfinance, half the sources were fabricated and almost certainly a WP:COI. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.