Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree of Peace (World War I)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tree of Peace (World War I)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The bulk of the sources are by the project initiator, the soon-to-be-deleted Marek Sobola. Others are from the site of the already-deleted Servare et Manere, Sobola’s outfit. Either way, the self-promotion is clear. — Biruitorul ^Talk 16:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I completely agree. I see no redeeming features in this article. Wikipedia is not the place for it. Its WP:PROMO for the founder, self-aggrandisement and nothing else. scope_creep^Talk 20:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:REFBOMBed promotional article of a non-notable organization. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.